Sunday, 22 February 2015

TACKLING CLIMATE CHANGE SHOULD BE A GOVT PRIORITY

Tackling climate change is probably the single most important challenge facing humankind.  The last Labour government passed the Climate Change Act and was the first in the world to do so.

This government has retreated from the commitments given by the previous government and is full of climate change deniers.  That is why it is essential that Labour wins the next election to get the country back on track and ensure that the UK leads the world to make this an international priority.

Labour leader, Ed Miliband, has set out the objectives for a Labour government which would mean:

  •  Ambitious emissions targets for all countries, reviewed every five years, based on a scientific assessment of the progress towards the 2C goal.
  • A goal of net zero global emissions in the second half of this century.
  • Transparent, universal rules for measuring, verifying and reporting emissions with all countries adopting climate change adaptation plans.
  • An equitable deal in which richer countries provide support to poorer nations in their efforts to combat climate change.












Monday, 16 February 2015

REAL WAGES FELL BY OVER £500 IN THE EAST MIDLANDS IN 2014

The TUC has published analysis today showing average pay in the East Midlands fell by over £500 in real terms last year.

The report coincides with the launch of the TUC’s Fair Pay Fortnight, to raise awareness about pay inequality.  The campaign is calling for an increase in the minimum wage, greater extension of the living wage and higher pay settlements in the public and private sector.

Average full-time wages in the East Midlands have fallen in real terms by £2,652 per year since 2010, or £51 a week. 
This is the longest real wage squeeze since records began in the 1850s.  Even with inflation falling sharply in recent months, at current rates of progress it will still take years for wages to recover to their pre-recession levels.

Meanwhile, as average wages for workers saw a real terms fall of 9.6 per cent since 2014, fat cat pay for FTSE 100 bosses shot up by 26 per cent.  To put it another way, while workers’ wages have fallen, the remuneration of FTSE executives is on average £700,000 higher today than it was in 2010.

Rising inequality in the UK is threatening the future of our economy.  We therefore desperately need a different approach to stop Britain returning to a 'Downton Abbey' society. 

Changes in the median annual real earnings of full-time employees 2010-2014
Change Since 2010 (£)
Change Since 2010 (per cent)
Change Since 2013 (£)
Change since 2013 (per cent)
Region/nation


United Kingdom
-2,509
-8.4
-487
-1.8
North East
-1,663
-6.3
164
+0.7
North West
-2,461
-8.9
-506
-2.0
Yorkshire and The Humber
-2,380
-8.7
-554
-2.2
East Midlands
-2,652
-9.6
-510
-2.0
West Midlands
-2,430
-8.9
-1,037
-4.0
East
-2,297
-7.9
-343
-1.3
London
-3,940
-10.1
-978
-2.7
South East
-2,935
-9.3
-390
-1.3
South West
-2,085
-7.5
-298
-1.2
Wales
-2,217
-8.3
-318
-1.3
Scotland
-1,882
-6.5
-102
-0.4
Northern Ireland
-1,681
-6.5
-527
-2.1
Source: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, RPI adjusted. All real values are reported are in April 2014 prices, using April RPI: All Items Index values

Changes in FTSE 100 CEOs real earnings 2010-2014
Change Since 2010 (£)
Change since 2010 (per cent)
FTSE 100 Chief Executives
+£696,236
+26.3
Source: IDS Directors’ Pay Report 2014/15, data from Graph 1.2: CEO and employee median earning trends data 2000 to 2014.

FTSE 100 CE0 pay, compared to median earnings
East Midlands median wage in 2014
£25,027
How many more times the regional median wage FTSE 100 earned in 20141
133
Hours it took CEO to earn median wage in region2
15
Working days it took CEO to earn median wage in region3
2.0

1This value is FTSE 100 median annual wage divided by regional full time median annual wage and rounded to the nearest whole number.
2This value assumes a standard working week of 37.5 hours per week for 52 weeks per year. Not taking any leave into account, this comes to 1950 standard working hours per year. The FTSE 100 median hourly wage was therefore estimated at £1,709.74, which is the FTSE 100 median annual wage divided by 1950.  Finally, each regional full time median annual wage was then divided by this hourly rate and rounded to the nearest hour.
3This value took the number of hours it would take a FTSE 100 CEO to earn the full-time median annual wage divided by a standard 7.5 hour work day and was rounded to the nearest tenth of a day.
- Fair Pay Fortnight will run between Monday 16 February and Sunday 1 March.
- The Fortnight is part of the TUC’s Britain Needs a Pay Rise campaign and will feature a series of events across England and Wales to raise awareness about low pay, pay inequality and falling living standards. For more information please visit www.fairpayfortnight.org

Sunday, 15 February 2015

WAS TORY FUNDRAISER POLITICAL SATIRE? NO IT WAS REAL LIFE

THE recent revelations about the Tories’ latest fundraising activity could genuinely have come straight from a political satire or even a sketch show.

Picture the scene.  Hundreds of obscenely wealthy Tories throwing cash around like there’s no tomorrow, spending outrageous sums on ridiculous auction lots.

Imagine one snooty Tory splashing out £110,000 so he and his pals can shoot 500 pheasants,  or another paying twice that sum for a week’s holiday at a 24-guest mansion in Majorca.

The sketch would climax with another millionaire splashing out more than £200,000 on a bronze bust of that dubious heroine to all Tories – Margaret Thatcher.

I can well imagine settling down on my sofa to watch such entertainment on a Sunday night, or perhaps as an ironic sketch highlighting the differences between rich and poor on Comic Relief.

The incredible truth is that the picture I have painted is not a fiction, but a genuine description of David Cameron’s recent fundraising ball.

This is a political party that tries to make capital out of Labour’s funding links to the trade unions.

Yet here it was, drawing cash from its wealthiest donors who stumped up £15,000 per table even to be at the event, even before the auction began.

Who are you more like?  Someone who is part of a trade union, or the sort of person who can afford to spend six figure sums on whatever folly takes their fancy on a whim, or perhaps to impress their pals.

And that, in a nutshell, is the difference between the Labour Party and the Conservative Party.
One is representative of the worker, and one is representative of the elite super-rich.

It is reflected in everything our respective parties stand for.  Labour is about sharing the wealth and ensuring that everyone is treated fairly and equitably, regardless of their situation.  The Tories are about ensuring that the wealth of the richest is protected, at the expense of the poor.

That’s why my party makes pledges to do things like abolish the bedroom tax, whereas the Tories introduce tax cuts for millionaires.

David Cameron’s quote in the official brochure for the plush fundraiser says it all: “As the clock ticks down to polling day, we all need to dig deep to ensure that we stick to our plan.”

A personal message to millionaires, and a sinister reference to “our” plan.

What is this plan you share with the super-rich, Mr Cameron?  To make them richer still while you continue your austerity measures and slash public spending?

It absolutely defies belief, and is truly sickening.  In a few words, the Prime Minister has summarised everything I despise about Tory ideology, and about the exclusive club who benefit from their policies.

The truth is that there are very few people who really benefit from a Conservative Britain.

I have a theory that the secret to their success is by convincing those better paid ‘ordinary’ people – not the millionaires or super-rich but the so-called middle earners – that they are beneficiaries of Tory policies.

They are not.

The truth is that, unless you’re the sort of person who can afford to spend lavish amounts of cash on stupid auction prizes like those I’ve described, you don’t come close to benefiting from Tory policy. 

Any people not in that bracket who vote Tory under a mistaken belief that they are rich enough to benefit are, unfortunately, kidding themselves.

These are the voters who we need to come home to Labour, because only Labour is capable of reversing the damaging cuts that have widened the gulf between rich and poor and damaged our country.

Britain is in a far worse state than it was five years ago, thanks to the Tories, yet the deficit has not been addressed.  Conservative policies have failed.


While the champagne-quaffing millionaires may chuck their money about without a care in the world, it troubles me to contemplate the state our country will be in if this goes on for five more years. 

Thursday, 12 February 2015

VENEZUELA UNDER ATTACK FROM RIGHTWING INSURGENTS

Today marks the first anniversary of the start of the violent 2014 ‘La Salida’ protests in Venezuela.  The intention is to oust the country’s elected, constitutional Government.

These developments in Venezuela are disturbing echo of the US backed rightwing coup in Chile 42 years ago when Salvador Allende was brutally overthrown.  Allende was replaced by the vile dictator General Augusto Pinochet with horrifying consequences for human rights and the neoliberal economics that was inflicted on the country led to an exponential rise in poverty and inequality.

The violence and undemocratic intentions of these extremist elements have also been condemned by regional bodies such as the Organisation of American States and Union of South American Nations.

Commenting on the Situation in Venezuela, Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa said: “We are reminded of the economic warfare that was carried out by the Chilean elites against Salvador Allende once they realized that they could not achieve victory in the ballot box and were defeated in the legislative elections in 1973.”

Everyone who believes in democracy and progressive politics should support the Venezuelan people against this rightwing, anti-democratic insurgency.

That is why I was proud to add my name to the statement below in support of peace and dialogue in Venezuela, and against U.S sanctions, which they recently introduced on the country.  Prominent signatories supporting President Nicolas Maduro's government include former Labour Government Ministers Frank Dobson, Peter Hain, Sir Gerald Kaufman and Andrew Smith.

This is the full statement followed by all the names of all the signatories.

"We the undersigned join Latin America’s main regional bodies such as the Organisation of American States and UNASUR (Union of South American nations) in both condemning the wave of anti-democratic violence from extreme elements of Venezuela’s right-wing opposition, whose declared aim (‘La Salida’) is the ousting of the elected government, and in supporting the calls of Venezuela’s elected President Nicolas Maduro for peace and dialogue.

"We agree with the OAS in its call for “respect for the principle of non intervention in the internal affairs of states and its commitment to the defense of democratic institutionalism of the state of law in agreement with the OAS Charter and international law,” and therefore disagree with all external interference, including through any US sanctions on Venezuela.

"We urge all parties internationally to support the efforts of UNASUR in working for peace and dialogue in Venezuela.”

Signatories:

1.       Dave Anderson MP,
2.       William Bain MP,
3.       Roberta Blackman-Woods MP,
4.       Paul Blomfield MP,
5.       Katy Clark MP,
6.       Michael Connarty MP,
7.       Jeremy Corbyn MP,
8.       Mike Crockart MP,
9.       Jim Cunningham MP,
10.   Nic Dakin MP,
11.   Ian Davidson MP,
12.   John Denham MP,
13.   Rt. Hon Frank Dobson MP,
14.   Brian Donohoe MP,
15.   Frank Doran MP,
16.   Jim Dowd MP,
17.   Mark Durkan MP,
18.   Neil Findlay MSP,
19.   John Finnie MSP,
20.   Paul Flynn MP,
21.   George Galloway MP,
22.   Andrew George MP,
23.   Lord Anthony Gifford QC,
24.   Sheila Gilmore MP,
25.   Roger Godsiff MP,
26.   Tom Greatrex MP,
27.   Nia Griffith MP,
28.   Rt. Hon. Peter Hain MP,
29.   David Hamilton MP,
30.   Mike Hancock MP,
31.   Mark Hendrick MP,
32.   Stephen Hepburn MP,
33.   Cara Hilton MSP,
34.   Kate Hoey MP,
35.   Jim Hood MP,
36.   Kelvin Hopkins MP,
37.   George Howarth MP,
38.   Glenda Jackson MP,
39.   Cathy Jamieson MP,
40.   Bethan Jenkins AM (Welsh Assembly Member,)
41.   Darren Johnson AM (London Assembly Member,)
42.   Baroness Jenny Jones AM (London Assembly Member,)
43.   Rt. Hon. Sir Gerald Kaufman MP,
44.   Jean Lambert MEP,
45.   Ian Lavery MP,
46.   John Leech MP,
47.   Alex Lowley MSP,
48.   Elfyn Llwyd MP,
49.   John McDonnell MP,
50.   Catherine McKinnell MP,
51.   Siobhan McMahon MSP,
52.   Anne McTaggart MSP,
53.   Michael Meacher MP,
54.   Graeme Morrice MP,
55.   Grahame Morris MP,
56.   Ian Murray MP,
57.   Lord Martin O’Neill of Clackmannan,
58.   Fiona O’Donnell MP,
59.   Sandra Osborne MP,
60.   Albert Owen MP,
61.   Murad Qureshi AM (London Assembly Member,)
62.   Jenny Rathbone AM (Welsh Assembly Member,)
63.   Lord Nic Rea,
64.   Linda Riordan MP,
65.   RT. Hon. Dame Joan Ruddock MP,
66.   John Robertson MP,
67.   Alex Rowley MSP,
68.   Lindsey Roy MP CBE,
69.   Barry Sheerman MP,
70.   Jim Sheridan MP,
71.   Rt. Hon. Andrew Smith MP,
72.   Elaine Smith MSP,
73.   Stephen Timms MP,
74.   Derek Twigg MP,
75.   Jean Urquhart MSP,
76.   David Ward MP,
77.   Tom Watson MP,
78.   Sandra White MSP,
79.   Hywel Williams MP,
80.   Mark Williams MP,
81.   Chris Williamson MP
82.   Mike Wood MP

Wednesday, 28 January 2015

BEGINNING OF THE END FOR AUSTERITY


SYRIZA’S resounding victory in the Greek general election creates a huge opportunity to reverse the damaging consequences of the austerity confidence trick being imposed across Europe.

Austerity in Greece - demanded by the terms of the 'bailout' by the Troika (European Commission, European Central Bank and International Monetary Fund) - has crippled the economy, with GDP falling by 26% since 2009, and unemployment running at 26%.

Nobel prize winning economist, Paul Krugman was withering in his criticism of the Troika's treatment of Greece.  He said: “If the troika had been truly realistic, it would have acknowledged that it was demanding the impossible.”

Syriza’s had made a series of demands including:
  • Writing-off the greater part of public debt’s nominal value so that it becomes sustainable in the context of a European Debt Conference.
  • Introducing a growth clause in the repayment of the remaining part of the debt so that it is growth-financed and not budget-financed.
  • Allowing a significant grace period moratorium in debt servicing to save funds for growth.
Syriza is seeking an immediate renegotiation of the terms of the so-called 'bailout' when the current arrangement expires on 28th February.

It is vital that they receive international support to renegotiate Greek public debt and end the humanitarian crisis that has been imposed on the Greek people.

It is imperative that Syriza succeed in these negotiations because it will have ramifications across Europe, including the UK, where austerity has been entirely counterproductive, hitting living standards and economic growth.

Syriza’s leader, Alexis Tsipras, summed up the futility and savagery of austerity when he said: “Austerity has proven to be an economic & social catastrophe.  He added: “Austerity is the crisis itself – it’s not a solution to the crisis.”  

Here in the UK since 2010, the Tories and their Lib Dem poodles have used their austerity programme to deliver an ideological agenda, that’s impoverished millions and further enriched the already super-rich. 

The state’s assets and taxpayers’ money have been put at the disposal of the corporate sector through privatisations and tax cuts.  Meanwhile ordinary citizens have seen their living standards under attack, unemployed and disabled people have been traduced and there has been a rapid rise of in-work poverty.

But it doesn’t have to be this way.  Just as the election of Hugo Chavez was a catalyst for the Democratic Bolivarian Revolution, which swept across Latin America rejecting neoliberalism in favour of a progressive alternative, so Syriza’s victory could be Europe’s catalyst.

There is a general election in Spain at the end of the year, and there too, people are weary of austerity that protects the wealthy and inflicts hardship on ordinary people.  There is a good chance that the Spanish people will elect the anti-austerity left-wing progressive party, Podemos, led by the charismatic Pablo Iglesias, a 35-year-old political science professor.

Sandwiched between these two elections is, of course, the British general election.  There is therefore an historic opportunity for Labour to be part of a progressive pan-European anti-austerity alliance.   

The spirit of 1945 beckons!  We need to seize the moment to reject neoliberalism and build a progressive alternative that makes capitalism the slave of democracy not the other way round.  That is why I signed the statement, along with 15 other Labour MPs, calling for the party to build on our progressive offer by being more ambitious ahead of the next election.  You can read the statement here: http://labourlist.org/2015/01/16-labour-mps-release-statement-calling-for-change-in-party-policy-direction/

Such an approach is not only the right thing to do, it is popular too, a view reinforced by a YouGov poll showing that Labour would gain more support with an anti-austerity message: http://labourlist.org/2015/01/labour-could-gain-more-support-with-anti-austerity-message-poll-finds/

So although Britain and Greece are very different, there are lessons that Labour can learn from Syriza's political prospectus.  I would love to see Labour at the heart of a progressive anti-austerity Europe.  If we win the election in 98 days, we can take the first step on that journey.  I will certainly be doing all I can to make sure that we do.

In the meantime two parliamentary motions welcoming the election of Syriza are gaining support from Labour MPs in the House of Commons - EDMs 729 and 733: http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2014-15/729
http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2014-15/733 

Tuesday, 27 January 2015

CLOSURE OF NHS WALK-IN CENTRES HITTING A&E

FAILING to see the wood for the trees has been a common theme of David Cameron’s Government, but the latest farce NHS Walk-In Centres is an issue which is playing with people’s lives.

It is well over two millennia since Aristotle first mused the concept of what made things happen, but the principle of cause and effect is evidently lost on the Tories.

So obsessed are they with enforcing their ideological blueprint on the UK that it seems they just cannot see beyond the end of their nose at the damage they cause.

First we saw it with the economy. They sucked the money out, increased joblessness and then scratched their heads as the welfare bill went up.

We’ve also seen it with councils. Budgets have been slashed, services have diminished and then the Tories declare it an outrage when local authorities are left with little choice but to increase council tax as they try to make ends meet.

It’s happened with policing, where there are now fewer bobbies on the beat, and it’s happened with fire services, where intervention work has been hammered and firefighter numbers have been slashed. The consequential increases in crime and delayed response times are an inevitability.

But the abominable way in which the Government has treated the much-loved NHS is among the worst of their attacks on public services. Quite aside from making a hash of a costly reorganisation which wasn’t even needed, their funding decisions are now leading to increasing numbers of NHS walk-in centres being closed up and down the country.

It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that fewer NHS walk-in centres will result in more people attending A&E departments. And nor do you have to be of Aristotle’s intellect to grasp that more pressure means slower service delivery.

The next logical step is the most devastating, though. And that is that a slower, bogged down A&E service inevitably leads to less prompt treatment and, awfully, the increased likelihood of deaths.

As is so often the case with this Government’s cuts, the ministers making the reckless decisions will largely be unwittingly shielded by the organisations being forced to react to them.

I don’t blame the clinical commissioning groups that are proposing closures of walk-in centres any more than I blame councils cutting services or emergency services being forced to remove frontline officers.

They have to make the best of a desperately bad situation, and they have a duty to protect and prioritise whichever services they are able to.

But I do blame the Government for, again and again, either failing to see or perhaps failing to care about how they are damaging lives.

That is why I have signed a Parliamentary motion highlighting that it is unacceptable to shut A&E departments when patients have nowhere else to turn, and pointing out the vital role NHS walk-in centres play in reducing A&E footfall.

We’re less than 100 days from a General Election, and the public need to make a decision on whether these relentless attacks to our services is what they want to sign up for.

I certainly don’t remember reading anything about crushing Britain’s public services in the Tory manifesto back in 2010, but that certainly looks likely to be Mr Cameron’s legacy.

Perhaps if the Tories suffer a huge collapse in support at the ballot boxes on May 7, it may finally help them to finally grasp what cause and effect is all about.

IN 100 DAYS WHITHER THE UK

IN 100 days the polls will be open for the General Election. I see that as a key milestone as we move towards what will be an incredibly close election that Labour is still on course to win.

Labour certainly has plenty to be proud about from the last five years. As an effective opposition, we have held the Government to account over a wide range of outrageous policy decisions. These have included the cruel welfare reforms, imposition of the bedroom tax, relentless attacks on public services, wasteful reforms of the NHS and hopeless inaction to address the housing crisis and escalating energy costs. While Shadow Fire Minister, I was also particularly proud to lead a campaign which resulted in this Government's half-baked ideologically driven plans to privatise our fire services being shelved.

But, unlike the Tories and Lib Dems, as a party we have never focused solely on the inadequacies of our political opponents; we have plenty to be proud about ourselves. Perhaps the most memorable achievement locally was the campaign to save Bombardier. I was delighted to lead the biggest petition Derby has ever known and I am in no doubt that our fierce opposition to the outrageous decision to send the Thameslink deal overseas affected later contract awards. Another issue I have been heavily involved in has been lobbying for funding to protect and enhance Derby’s flood defences, and again we have enjoyed success on that front too.

We have also fought hard to highlight the issue of low paid workers being penalised through zero hours contracts, an issue which is firmly on the agenda for all parties to address. And in this city we have led a campaign to persuade employers to offer the Living Wage, with the council having been the first major organisation to rise to that challenge.

Labour is less than 50 seats behind the Tories, who currently hold 303 seats against Labour's 257, so we know already the election is going to be tight.

It is therefore all the more important that people who believe in social justice and want a progressive government should unite behind Labour. Only a Labour government can help the country to recover from five ruinous years of Tory control. Labour is the only party capable of forming a government with progressive solutions to the challenges facing the country on issues like the cost of living crisis, housing, NHS, education, environmental sustainability, energy, jobs, social care and transport.

This could be Labour's year to return to power, but it is going to be close. I therefore urge anyone who thinks that Britain deserves better; who wants austerity to be jettisoned; who believes in putting public service before private profit; to join me making it happen.